Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA)

Capability Requirements for Telecommunications Carriers

Section 103 of CALEA sets forth the assistance capability requirements that telecommunications carriers need to maintain to support law enforcement in the conduct of lawfully-authorized electronic surveillance. Specifically, CALEA directs the telecommunications industry to design, develop, and deploy solutions that meet certain assistance capability requirements.

Pursuant to a court order or other lawful authorization, carriers must be able to: (1) expeditiously isolate all wire and electronic communications of a target transmitted by the carrier within its service area; (2) expeditiously isolate call-identifying information of a target; (3) provide intercepted communications and call-identifying information to law enforcement; and (4) carry out intercepts unobtrusively, so targets are not made aware of the electronic surveillance, and in a manner that does not compromise the privacy and security of other communications.

On August 15, 2000, in the case of United States Telecom Association, et al., Petitioners v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, respondents and AirTouch Communications, Inc., Interveners. (D.C. Circuit, August 15, 2000) the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit partially vacated and remanded to the Federal Communications Commission the Third Report and Order FCC 99-230. The court vacated the FCC’s decision with respect to four Punch List capabilities: dialed digit extraction, party/hold/join/drop information, subject initiated dialing and signaling, and in-band/out-of-band signaling. The court’s ruling requires the FCC to reconsider whether these four Punch List items are mandated by CALEA, and to enter a new decision in accordance with the court’s instructions. The court primarily vacated the FCC’s order on the grounds that the FCC had not adequately explained and supported its reasons for determining that any of the capabilities were required by CALEA. In particular, the court directed the FCC to more fully explain the their consideration of the privacy protection and cost minimization factors of Sections 107(b)(1) and (3) and to explain its application of the CALEA definition of call identifying information. The court specifically directed the FCC to address on remand how to protect the privacy and security of communications not authorized to be intercepted in the case of dialed digit extraction.

Rejecting the challenges of certain privacy groups, the court refused to vacate the FCC’s Order with respect to packet-mode communications and location information. These two capabilities, and other punch list items that were not challenged before the court (including conference call surveillance and timing information), therefore were not altered by the court’s decision.

On September 21, 2001, the FCC released Order FCC 01-265. In the Order, the FCC granted in part the relief requested by CTIA by temporarily suspending the September 30, 2001, compliance date for wireline, cellular, and broadband PCS carriers to implement two punch list capabilities mandated by the Third Report and Order FCC 99-230. Also, the FCC denied CTIA’s request for a blanket extension of the September 30, 2001, compliance deadline for these carriers to implement a packet-mode communications capability. However, due to the imminence of the packet-mode compliance deadline, the FCC granted these carriers until November 19, 2001, either to come into compliance or seek individual relief. You can read the news announcement regarding Order FCC 01-265.

An Order on Remand FCC 02-108 ordering capabilities authorized by CALEA that must be provided by wireline, cellular, and broadband PCS telecommunications carriers was released by the FCC on April 11, 2002. The FCC issued this order in response to a decision issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit that vacated four FBI ?punch list? electronic surveillance capabilities mandated by the Third Report and Order.

FCC 00-237

FCC 00-237
TOLL FREE FIFTH REPORT AND ORDER

We look to our Federal Advisory Committee on numbering issues, the NANC, for a recommendation on how best to administer toll free numbers. We ask the NANC to address whether a system of administration similar to that used to administer the NANP or a different system should be established. Among the alternatives NANC should consider is whether the ownership and operation of the centralized toll free database system should be transferred to a non-government and/or non-carrier entity, and whether SMS/800 service should continue to be provided under tariff. Additionally, we seek recommendations from the NANC to facilitate the selection of the administrator through a competitive bidding process similar to the process used to select the North American Numbering Plan Administrator.[1] Specifically, we ask the NANC to develop the necessary technical requirements for toll free number administration. We direct the NANC to submit its recommendations to the Commission within 180 days of the effective date of this Order. Upon receipt of the NANC’s recommendations and public comment, we will move expeditiously to determine whether it is in the public interest to restructure the ownership and operation of the current system of toll free number administration, and, if so, whether a new toll free number administrator should be selected.[2]

Toll Free Administration
Management and Oversight Structure

* Break Up the SMT
* Owner/Operators cannot be affiliated with the Administration, Data Center or SCP
* Need Neutral 3rd party Toll Free Administrator, Data Center and SCP

Toll Free Administration
Management and Oversight Structure

Propose that the current SMT be replaced with a Limited Liability Corporation (LLC) similar to what exists for LNP.

The LLC would be open to any entity that provides toll free service.

LLC members will have equal vote

LLC manages the RFP for toll free vendor(s)

LLC manages vendor performance and costs

LLC manages the day-to-day relationship with the vendor

Each member pays a fee to join the LLC to cover the operational costs of the LLC

The FCC has ultimate oversight over the LLC and toll free administration.

Toll Free LLC

Responsible for
o
+ System planning (both long and short term)
+ Database functional requirements
+ Negotiating vendor contracts
+ Ensuring vendor compliance

Toll Free Pricing

* Toll Free Service no longer provided under SMS/800 Access Tariff
* Simplified pricing elements such as:
o Shared industry costs per Section 251(e) of the Telecommunications Act
o Monthly fee for RespOrg system access
o Enterprise Services

Beware of the Toll-Free Ownership Certificate Scam

ATTENTION:  ALL RESPONSIBLE ORGANIZATIONS

Beware of Fake Ownership Certificates While Porting Toll Free Numbers To Your RespOrg.

A number of telephone companies have been reporting that they are receiving an influx of new toll-free customers that want the telephone company to port a “new” 800 number to their resporg.

Your new customer may attempt to provide what they believe to be a “legitimate” certificate showing that they have the legal rights to the specified 800, 888, 877 or 866 phone number.  Oftentimes these customers have paid upto $5000 for this certificate, but unfortunately they were scammed.

scammer2These home-made 800 number ownership certificates are often made on home computers, they look like they could be authentic but they are far from it.  They come in a variety of designs.

Please note: there have also been unconfirmed reports that con artists are also giving out fake telephone bills (page 1 of the bill) as a secondary proof of ownership.  Neither of these are real or valid and should not be accepted by your company.

The scam works like this…

The con artist will tell the prospective target that they have (or can obtain) toll free numbers for them to have, something that would be too good to be true like 1-800-123-4567.  They typically charge anywhere from a few dollars to $5000 depending on how much they think their target is worth.   The seller of the toll free numbers will then issue what they claim to be a certificate showing that their target is the owner of the new 800 numbers.  The con artist will then tell their target that in order to use the toll-free number; they must transfer it to another phone company.  The con artist coaches the target on how to use this fake certificate to attempt to acquire phone service.

The Federal Communications Commission regulates the use of toll free numbers in the United States and they specifically prohibit this type of “brokering” of toll free numbers.  The article asks that you contact the FCC regarding this scam.

If you encounter this scam, it’s illegal and should be reported to the FCC for investigation.  If you encounter anyone who has been a victim of this scam, please give them the FCC phone number to call and report it 888-CALL-FCC.

Federal Communications Commission
445 12th Street SW                1(888)CALL-FCC
Washington, DC 20554                1(888)225-5322

How to avoid this scam
When porting a toll-free number into your company, always require a copy of your customers’ recent toll-free telephone bill issued from a legitimate Resp-org and verify that the name on the bill and the ring-down number match your records.  (make sure the bill is not fake) and make sure your customers identity is true.  More on transferring a number

Text from:

http://www.free-press-release.com/news/200807/1217114562.html

MANY RETAILERS RING UP BUSINESS VIA PHONE SALES

Retail outlets across the country are discovering a hot new marketing tool that’s not very new at all. It is the telephone. And this Christmas, more and more armchair shoppers, with either little time or desire to browse in stores, will reach for their credit cards, grab their telephones and order gifts from catalogues. Phone shopping is attracting a substantial number of new followers each year and rapidly replacing mail-order forms as the way to shop from home, catalog…

Verizon may cut off service to Vonage toll-free number customers

Verizon may cut off service to Vonage toll-free number customers

800 Numbers declining

The number of available 800 numbers is declining

The weakest link: are you losing customers in your telephone …

The weakest link: are you losing customers in your telephone …

MAYOR LAUNCHES TOLL-FREE NUMBER FOR KATRINA EVACUEES

The city of Seattle issued the following news release: Mayor Greg Nickels today approved money for …

Phone Sex Lines Go Distance to Fleece Callers

Phone Sex Lines Go Distance to Fleece Callers

Area Code Change ‘a Bummer’.

We’re actually lucky that it will not affect our business, at least on the national level, because We have an 800 number,” said Daniel Gagnon, …